Volume 19 (2017) Article 12
Questioning ten common assumptions about peatlands
by University of Leeds Peat Club: K.L. Bacon, A.J. Baird, A. Blundell, M-A. Bourgault, P.J. Chapman, G. Dargie, G.P. Dooling, C. Gee, J. Holden, T. Kelly, K.A. McKendrick-Smith, P.J. Morris, A. Noble, S.M. Palmer, A. Quillet, G.T. Swindles, E.J. Watson and D.M. Young
Published online: 16.07.2017
Summary
Peatlands have been widely studied in terms of their ecohydrology, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services and palaeoenvironmental archives. However, several assumptions are frequently made about peatlands in the academic literature, practitioner reports and the popular media which are either ambiguous or in some cases incorrect. Here we discuss the following ten common assumptions about peatlands:
1. the northern peatland carbon store will shrink under a warming climate;
2. peatlands are fragile ecosystems;
3. wet peatlands have greater rates of net carbon accumulation;
4. different rules apply to tropical peatlands;
5. peat is a single soil type;
6. peatlands behave like sponges;
7. Sphagnum is the main ‘ecosystem engineer’ in peatlands;
8. a single core provides a representative palaeo-archive from a peatland;
9. water-table reconstructions from peatlands provide direct records of past climate change; and
10. restoration of peatlands results in the re-establishment of their carbon sink function.
In each case we consider the evidence supporting the assumption and, where appropriate, identify its shortcomings or ways in which it may be misleading.
Citation
University of Leeds Peat Club: Bacon, K.L., Baird, A.J., Blundell, A., Bourgault, M-A., Chapman, P.J., Dargie, G., Dooling, G.P., Gee, C., Holden, J., Kelly, T., McKendrick-Smith, K.A., Morris, P.J., Noble, A., Palmer, S.M., Quillet, A., Swindles, G.T., Watson, E.J. & Young, D.M. (2017): Questioning ten common assumptions about peatlands. Mires and Peat, 19(12), 1-23. (Online: http://www.mires-and-peat.net/pages/volumes/map19/map1912.php); 10.19189/MaP.2016.OMB.253
Reviewers
IMCG and IPS acknowledge the work of the reviewers. |
